Apply for an IPPL
Fellowship
Fellowship competition for AY
2010 - 2011 is now open.
Deadline for stage 2 of the applications is July 1.
See below for application instructions.
The Institute for Philosophy in Public Life is
seeking applications for three or four fellowships for the upcoming academic year.
All applications must be submitted electronically. Projects are not evaluated based on political position or
philosophical school of thought. However, projects cannot explicitly
advocate for any political, religious, or social cause. The projects must be
philosophical in nature.
IPPL Fellowships are both invited by the director and chosen via
open competition. Any interested party is encouraged to apply, and prospective
applicants are welcome to contact the director informally to ask for advice or
to "test the waters" for their suitability and competitiveness.
An IPPL Visiting Fellowship is intended for philosophical
professionals who seek an intensive short-term period to work on a specific
project free from the intrusions of daily work and family responsibilities, and
who wish to translate that same project into language easily understood by
general audiences. Visiting fellows are in residence at the institute for two weeks.
They receive travel, meal, housing allowances, a $1,000 stipend, access to the
University of North Dakota library and all relevant university resources, a $500
grant to purchase research materials to be housed within the UND Chester Fritz
Library, and an office within which to work. In exchange, visiting fellows are
expected to make at least two public presentations suitable to lay audiences and
write a ten to fifteen page article for publication either online or in the
North Dakota Humanities Council magazine On Second Thought.
Regional applicants are encouraged to apply, but are not exempt from the
two-week residence requirement.
International applicants may only have a portion of their airfare paid (up to
$600), but are eligible to receive all other benefits.
APPLICATION PROCESS
The current application process is as follows. All material
should be submitted electronically to:
ippl@und.edu.
(1) Write the director about your intent to apply and the
proposed dates of the fellowship; priority will be given to those who can visit
the IPPL during the normal school year (September - May) and to those who can be
flexible about dates of travel. Include a brief discussion of your project (no more than three short
paragraphs) and a short biographical description. The director will respond
regarding the propriety of the application. No substantive judgment will be made
at this time other than the suitability of the project.
(2) If the project is suitable for IPPL, you will be asked to
submit: July 1 Deadline
- a more substantive description of your project.
- a one-page account of your project suitable for lay
audiences including why your work is relevant to day-to-day life. Please
note, IPPL holds the position that all philosophical research, no matter
how obscure can be shown to be relevant to everyday life. The task here
is to show that you, the applicant, can articulate this relevance in a
compelling way.
- An updated CV.
- A more detailed biographical sketch. If your previous work
has included philosophical research for general audiences, this should be
emphasized.
- Sample publications relevant to the project, including
work for specialists and general audiences.
- A list of references including all contact information.
(3) If the application is competitive, the applicant will
likely undergo a
phone interview to discuss any of the submitted material. (When
convenient, regional fellows may sometimes be interviewed in person.) On
occasion, a second interview by a member of the advisory board may be
recommended.
(4) If the application continues to be competitive, the director will contact
some of your references after which you will be notified of the decision
regarding your application. If the application is rejected, time permitting, the
director will offer suggests as to how to better your application in the future
including areas that might be strengthened in future applications. Previous applicants
are encouraged to reapply for future fellowships.
One final note: sometimes an application is rejected because of
weaknesses in the project or its presentation. This cannot be avoided and the
director will work hard to be forthright about these issues. However, sometimes
an application is rejected because of the competitiveness of the field. There
are times when a project is outstanding and an applicant is doing excellent work but there are
others whose application are stronger. The director will be honest about this as
well, although competitiveness should not be confused with prestige. IPPL fully intends to
supplement resources for those who have less access. Again, the director will be
forthright regarding these issues. In short, it is worth keeping in mind that,
as with any application of this sort, applications are evaluated both
comparatively and on their own terms.